A lot of explanation

ast time out I managed to spend the entire time explaining the intricacies of this "fundamental" study method.

Enough explaining, you say. Bring on the caseplays!

Fair enough, but just as a reminder, here are the ground rules:

I'll list the fundamental statements in each group, then offer a caseplay that will be able to draw on one or more of those fundamental statements. From there, I'll work through the caseplay to determine the ruling, first by using one or more of those fundamental statements, then defining any terms involved, and finally referencing other rules that support the ruling. Along the way, you have to discipline yourself to look up each and every definition, whether you think you know it or not.

Here we go ...

Fundamental I, Possession, contains eight (8) statements: